Farm Subsidy information
Roberts County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Roberts County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,144
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $29,355,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Tim Allen Gleason | Veblen, SD 57270 | $41,126 |
82 | Gleason Farms LLC | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $41,107 |
83 | Neil Fritz | New Effington, SD 57255 | $40,700 |
84 | Clifford Wade Krause | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $40,649 |
85 | Lowell G Wegener | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $40,539 |
86 | Robert Meland | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $40,507 |
87 | Shirley A Johnson | Beardsley, MN 56211 | $40,422 |
88 | Neil Alan Bartnick | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $40,201 |
89 | Nina Borgen | New Effington, SD 57255 | $40,196 |
90 | Jerome Borgen | New Effington, SD 57255 | $40,196 |
91 | Shawn B Gruby | Grenville, SD 57239 | $39,881 |
92 | Van Cleve Farm Inc | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $39,770 |
93 | Curtis Braun | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $39,469 |
94 | Julie Braun | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $39,469 |
95 | Paul Bostrom | New Effington, SD 57255 | $39,056 |
96 | Adam Michael Hilpert | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $38,905 |
97 | Jeffrey Currence | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $38,659 |
98 | Kevin Joseph Hrncir | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $38,394 |
99 | Louis Dale Nigg | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $38,381 |
100 | Daren James Koeppe | Claire City, SD 57224 | $38,217 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”