Conservation Reserve Program in Roberts County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,638
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $105,713,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Paul Bostrom | New Effington, SD 57255 | $278,661 |
82 | Gladyce Ammann | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $276,381 |
83 | Scott Phillips | Lake City, SD 57247 | $274,738 |
84 | Sisters Of Enterprise LLC | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $271,876 |
85 | Le Roy Lewandowski | Waubay, SD 57273 | $271,600 |
86 | Jerome P Keintz | Lake City, SD 57247 | $269,038 |
87 | Rollin J Morehouse | Austin, TX 78738 | $268,887 |
88 | Richard Sando | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $268,872 |
89 | Dale Chilson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $268,844 |
90 | Evean Holland | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $262,491 |
91 | Kevin Joseph Hrncir | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $261,072 |
92 | David Skog | New Effington, SD 57255 | $260,882 |
93 | Widhalm Farms Inc | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $259,859 |
94 | Metz Farms Inc | Peever, SD 57257 | $258,320 |
95 | Gerald Balvin | Claire City, SD 57224 | $257,684 |
96 | Donald German | Peever, SD 57257 | $246,557 |
97 | Jean Phillips | Lake City, SD 57247 | $245,116 |
98 | Richard Foltz | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $234,297 |
99 | Sheila Bartz Family Irrevocable T | New Effington, SD 57255 | $231,297 |
100 | Jeffery Wade Quale | Summit, SD 57266 | $229,538 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”