Total Conservation Programs in Roberts County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 602
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $6,716,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Dale Carlson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $22,033 |
102 | David Duane Peterson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $21,902 |
103 | Donald Ray Nelson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $20,658 |
104 | William Nigg Living Trust | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $20,644 |
105 | Allen Peterson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $20,632 |
106 | Medbery Farm | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $20,552 |
107 | Virgil Lewandowski | Waubay, SD 57273 | $20,382 |
108 | Michael Francis Lewno | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $20,239 |
109 | Cindy Grace Lewno | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $20,239 |
110 | Lavae Nelson | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $19,874 |
111 | Michael Rolstad | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $19,506 |
112 | Dorothy Dahlberg | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $19,432 |
113 | Elroy Dahlberg Trust | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $19,432 |
114 | James Swanson | Ortley, SD 57256 | $19,176 |
115 | Chad Jerold Krueger | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $19,166 |
116 | Renata Fellbaum | New Effington, SD 57255 | $18,950 |
117 | Justin James Metz | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $18,365 |
118 | Rodney E Voss Irrv Tr | Kansas City, MO 64133 | $17,585 |
119 | Richard Foltz | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $17,452 |
120 | Raymond Foltz | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $17,438 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”