Farm Subsidy information
Roberts County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Roberts County, South Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,167
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $46,983,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tyler Lynn Ammann | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $220,069 |
22 | Schiltz Goose Farm Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $212,036 |
23 | Jeffrey Haanen | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $205,324 |
24 | Buffalo Lake Ranch Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $199,670 |
25 | Jason E Frerichs | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $189,472 |
26 | Brian Joseph Renelt | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $186,706 |
27 | Minnwest Bank ** | Marshall, MN 56258 | $179,584 |
28 | Robert Lynn Sandbakken | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $177,563 |
29 | Gregory Charles Pearson | Ortley, SD 57256 | $176,925 |
30 | Theron Shane Rolstad | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $176,825 |
31 | L & J Nigg Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $175,335 |
32 | Johnson Beef Farms Inc | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $174,220 |
33 | Veflin Brothers Farms | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $173,922 |
34 | David Lloyd Pierce | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $173,748 |
35 | Rory Ceroll | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $166,731 |
36 | Cheryl Joy Renelt | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $166,018 |
37 | Todd Allen Whempner | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $162,267 |
38 | Jeffrey Todd Steffens | New Effington, SD 57255 | $160,600 |
39 | M N M Farms Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $158,256 |
40 | Dustin Neil Bartnick | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $155,483 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”