Total Disaster Programs in Roberts County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,506
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $32,099,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | L & J Nigg Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $193,421 |
22 | David Lotzer | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $183,673 |
23 | Gary Wayne Althoff | Waubay, SD 57273 | $183,230 |
24 | Amy Jo Piotter | New Effington, SD 57255 | $181,427 |
25 | Metz Farms Inc | Peever, SD 57257 | $176,626 |
26 | Allen James Meyer | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $174,231 |
27 | Daniel Marvin Piotter | New Effington, SD 57255 | $167,001 |
28 | Nieland Farms Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $161,897 |
29 | Neil Alan Bartnick | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $160,751 |
30 | William Fred Koeppe | Claire City, SD 57224 | $154,782 |
31 | Gregory Charles Pearson | Ortley, SD 57256 | $148,497 |
32 | Michael Sebek | Claire City, SD 57224 | $147,947 |
33 | Vig Livestock And Grain Inc | Claire City, SD 57224 | $145,345 |
34 | Jeffrey Merle Bartnick | New Effington, SD 57255 | $144,839 |
35 | White Rock Huttn Breth Inc | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $141,641 |
36 | Rm Foltz Inc | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $141,051 |
37 | David Roy Nigg | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $136,730 |
38 | Clarence Pistorius | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $136,471 |
39 | Sarah Jean Goodhart | Beardsley, MN 56211 | $133,514 |
40 | Mark Wayne Peterson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $133,352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”