Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Sanborn County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 210
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Sanborn County, South Dakota totaled $863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kelly Larson | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $3,345 |
82 | Marvin W Jirsa | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $3,297 |
83 | Edwin Blindauer | Letcher, SD 57359 | $3,297 |
84 | James Melvin Johannsen | Artesian, SD 57314 | $3,297 |
85 | Jerry L Moody | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $3,275 |
86 | Marvin Van Overschelde | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $3,250 |
87 | Arthur Eugene Kneen | Artesian, SD 57314 | $3,219 |
88 | Robert Nelson | Letcher, SD 57359 | $3,098 |
89 | Roger Schmit | Artesian, SD 57314 | $3,080 |
90 | Raymond Schmit | Artesian, SD 57314 | $3,080 |
91 | Raymond Kempf Estate | Artesian, SD 57314 | $3,056 |
92 | Patrick L Howard | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $3,054 |
93 | Teresa Wessel | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $3,045 |
94 | Lois Edwards | Letcher, SD 57359 | $3,014 |
95 | Timothy Scott Pearson | Forestburg, SD 57314 | $2,934 |
96 | A Russell Podhradsky | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $2,929 |
97 | Davis Ranch | Forestburg, SD 57314 | $2,928 |
98 | Arvin Kingsbury Estate | Letcher, SD 57359 | $2,895 |
99 | John Maher | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $2,880 |
100 | Dean S Senska | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $2,835 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”