Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Sanborn County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 192
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Sanborn County, South Dakota totaled $1,223,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Shirelly Snedeker | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $4,309 |
82 | Rubendall Cattle Co | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $4,290 |
83 | Randall Mcqueen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $4,161 |
84 | Charles Unterbrunner | Artesian, SD 57314 | $4,152 |
85 | Leonard William Hinker | Fedora, SD 57337 | $4,131 |
86 | Douglas L Farris | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $4,077 |
87 | David Baysinger | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $4,074 |
88 | Kevin Joseph Baysinger | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $4,019 |
89 | Jay Baysinger | Forestburg, SD 57314 | $3,930 |
90 | Laren Feistner | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $3,927 |
91 | Tanner Snedeker | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $3,812 |
92 | John Fenske | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $3,750 |
93 | Swenson Brothers LLC | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $3,712 |
94 | Charles Russell Pyle | Huron, SD 57350 | $3,570 |
95 | Rob Jay Baruth | Alpena, SD 57312 | $3,429 |
96 | Travis White | Fulton, SD 57340 | $3,402 |
97 | Craig Roth | Freeman, SD 57029 | $3,381 |
98 | Blake A Baade | Letcher, SD 57359 | $3,370 |
99 | Joseph Moody | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $3,288 |
100 | Nicholas Dickson | Huron, SD 57350 | $3,084 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”