Total Conservation Programs in Sanborn County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 245
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Sanborn County, South Dakota totaled $2,568,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Arthur M Hopper | Watertown, SD 57201 | $11,737 |
82 | Gary L Eddy | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $11,570 |
83 | Vanleur Limited Liability Partnership | Brandon, SD 57005 | $11,564 |
84 | Thomas A Fouberg | Forestburg, SD 57314 | $11,347 |
85 | John Gregory Bechen | Letcher, SD 57359 | $10,974 |
86 | Jerome Miller | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $10,736 |
87 | Robert F Davis | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $10,501 |
88 | Roger Moe | Letcher, SD 57359 | $10,450 |
89 | Richard Moe | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $10,450 |
90 | Mark Hinker | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $10,275 |
91 | Johnson Artesian Farm LLC | Brandon, SD 57005 | $10,180 |
92 | Wilma Ferguson Buffington | Artesian, SD 57314 | $10,072 |
93 | George M Rakes | Omaha, NE 68137 | $9,946 |
94 | Dianna Senska | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $9,922 |
95 | Douglas L Farris | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $9,898 |
96 | Neal W Hegg | Huron, SD 57350 | $9,864 |
97 | Gail Nelson Mrtl Tr Dated October 13 2020 | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $9,805 |
98 | Wesley Nelson Survivor's Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $9,805 |
99 | Randy White | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $9,800 |
100 | Frederick Prien | Letcher, SD 57359 | $9,730 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”