Total Conservation Programs in Sanborn County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 245
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Sanborn County, South Dakota totaled $2,568,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Kelly Clay Hohn | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $9,607 |
102 | Jeff Poyer | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $9,432 |
103 | Merlin Larson | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $9,191 |
104 | Walter Bracha Jr | Forestburg, SD 57314 | $9,133 |
105 | Randy J Fenske | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $9,062 |
106 | Jeanette M Luthi | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $9,061 |
107 | , | $8,955 | |
108 | John B Hopper | Watertown, SD 57201 | $8,903 |
109 | Glenn Kelly | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $8,808 |
110 | R&b Schmit LLC | Artesian, SD 57314 | $8,768 |
111 | Loren Van Overschelde | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $8,694 |
112 | Gregg A Bollinger | Kansas City, MO 64154 | $8,532 |
113 | Mark T Bollinger | Saint Johns, FL 32259 | $8,531 |
114 | Scott W Bollinger | Pierre, SD 57501 | $8,529 |
115 | William Ludenia | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $8,146 |
116 | Richard L & Vicki L Linke Irrev Re Trust | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $8,102 |
117 | Paul & Frances Van Overschelde LLC | Letcher, SD 57359 | $7,720 |
118 | Annschell Family Limited Partnership Llp | Sioux Falls, SD 57110 | $7,693 |
119 | Dolores V Kelsey | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $7,579 |
120 | Kent Swenson | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $7,479 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”