Conservation Reserve Program in Sanborn County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 245
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sanborn County, South Dakota totaled $2,568,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | B & B Livestock | Letcher, SD 57359 | $67,852 |
2 | Randall J Morgan | Letcher, SD 57359 | $64,318 |
3 | Beverly Monson | Webster, SD 57274 | $48,656 |
4 | Perry Amick | Letcher, SD 57359 | $47,637 |
5 | Charles Amick | Letcher, SD 57359 | $46,351 |
6 | Het Loo Farms LLC | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $44,449 |
7 | Scott Alexander | Alpena, SD 57312 | $43,967 |
8 | , | $41,659 | |
9 | Melanie Ettswold | Letcher, SD 57359 | $39,472 |
10 | William Davis Taunton Sr | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $38,055 |
11 | Gregory Effling | Artesian, SD 57314 | $35,118 |
12 | Klas LLC | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $34,193 |
13 | Dee Talley Farm | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $34,011 |
14 | Tyler Melvin Moore | Artesian, SD 57314 | $31,259 |
15 | Hk Fouberg Real Estate Limited Partnership | Letcher, SD 57359 | $30,959 |
16 | Dennis J Hegg Irrv Real Estate Tr | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $30,791 |
17 | E & P Swenson Family Lmtd Partnership | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $28,230 |
18 | Drew Heinzmann | Canistota, SD 57012 | $27,331 |
19 | Steven C Linke | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $26,026 |
20 | James Paul Huck | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $25,039 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>