Farm Subsidy information
Shannon County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Shannon County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 244
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shannon County, South Dakota totaled $5,417,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Pat L Heathershaw | Wall, SD 57790 | $31,507 |
42 | Sidney Allen Cuny | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $31,471 |
43 | Magnuson Sd Ltd | Martin, SD 57551 | $31,328 |
44 | Merlyn Jacobson | Batesland, SD 57716 | $30,885 |
45 | David E Cuny | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $28,928 |
46 | Frank Rapp | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $28,833 |
47 | Darrell Yellow Hair | Batesland, SD 57716 | $28,558 |
48 | Michael Clarence Carlow | Pine Ridge, SD 57770 | $28,514 |
49 | Nathan Kehn | Batesland, SD 57716 | $28,146 |
50 | Petro-mart Inc | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $28,047 |
51 | Clay R Johnson | Porcupine, SD 57772 | $28,006 |
52 | David Scott Cuny | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $27,463 |
53 | Lyla Hutchison | Wounded Knee, SD 57794 | $26,600 |
54 | Kenneth Knuppe | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $26,368 |
55 | Rollie Wilson | Buffalo, SD 57720 | $25,441 |
56 | Cliff Glade | Oelrichs, SD 57763 | $24,629 |
57 | Cheyenne G Wilson | Oelrichs, SD 57763 | $24,279 |
58 | Isaac Bettelyoun | Pine Ridge, SD 57770 | $24,107 |
59 | Randy Puckett | Kyle, SD 57752 | $23,318 |
60 | Calvin Ghost Bear | Oglala, SD 57764 | $22,557 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”