Farm Subsidy information
Shannon County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Shannon County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 142
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shannon County, South Dakota totaled $4,408,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Michael John Puckett | Kyle, SD 57752 | $20,342 |
62 | Eldon Lessert | Porcupine, SD 57772 | $20,287 |
63 | Donald Curtis Buffington Jr | Red Shirt, SD 57744 | $19,988 |
64 | Darrell Yellow Hair | Batesland, SD 57716 | $19,930 |
65 | David Keester | Manderson, SD 57756 | $19,687 |
66 | Julia Trevillyan | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $19,642 |
67 | Schwarting Brothers Partnership | Gordon, NE 69343 | $19,000 |
68 | Chance C Knutson | Pine Ridge, SD 57770 | $18,903 |
69 | Sandra G Buffington | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $18,755 |
70 | Marr Cummings | Porcupine, SD 57772 | $18,300 |
71 | Vincent Pilcher | Kyle, SD 57752 | $17,969 |
72 | Benedict Dale Scabby Face | Oglala, SD 57764 | $17,594 |
73 | Troy Weston | Porcupine, SD 57772 | $17,155 |
74 | Karen Twiss | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $16,703 |
75 | Ruth Cummings | Manderson, SD 57756 | $16,610 |
76 | Michael Joseph O'connell | Scenic, SD 57780 | $16,352 |
77 | Lois M Rapp Estate | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $15,893 |
78 | Robert Goodman | Kyle, SD 57752 | $15,618 |
79 | Justin J Little | Pine Ridge, SD 57770 | $15,401 |
80 | Warren Pourier Sr | Kyle, SD 57752 | $15,313 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”