Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Shannon County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 161
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Shannon County, South Dakota totaled $4,056,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mary Anne Wefso | Rushville, NE 69360 | $4,452 |
102 | Gilbert Ecoffey | Wounded Knee, SD 57794 | $4,442 |
103 | Francis Ferguson | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $4,419 |
104 | Winston Nelson | Gordon, NE 69343 | $4,286 |
105 | Susan Retherford | Colorado Springs, CO 80907 | $4,234 |
106 | Joseph Gerard Tacke | Yankton, SD 57078 | $4,192 |
107 | Irene Nedved | Lincoln, NE 68504 | $4,113 |
108 | Judith Merdanian | Oglala, SD 57764 | $4,088 |
109 | Loren Swick | Greeley, CO 80634 | $3,843 |
110 | Darrell Steele Estate | Pine Ridge, SD 57770 | $3,829 |
111 | Larry Swick | Gordon, NE 69343 | $3,758 |
112 | Dixon Pourier | Pine Ridge, SD 57770 | $3,650 |
113 | Henry Grooms | Porcupine, SD 57772 | $3,613 |
114 | Wesley Novotny | Batesland, SD 57716 | $3,488 |
115 | Michael Novotny | Batesland, SD 57716 | $3,488 |
116 | Jamie Novotny | Batesland, SD 57716 | $3,488 |
117 | J D Thurlow | Aurora, CO 80012 | $3,361 |
118 | Wilma Tope | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $3,179 |
119 | Gladys Shald Estate | Gordon, NE 69343 | $3,083 |
120 | Darlene Rust | Batesland, SD 57716 | $3,078 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”