Farm Subsidy information
Shannon County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Shannon County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 209
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shannon County, South Dakota totaled $5,163,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Walter Joseph Martinez | Kyle, SD 57752 | $8,754 |
102 | Petro-mart Inc | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $8,745 |
103 | Iris Wilson | Porcupine, SD 57772 | $8,341 |
104 | Jerene Heesacker | Porcupine, SD 57772 | $8,288 |
105 | Mike Josephson | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $8,117 |
106 | Ross Daniel Cuny | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $8,024 |
107 | Nancy Kehn | Batesland, SD 57716 | $8,008 |
108 | Ray Swallow | Batesland, SD 57716 | $7,937 |
109 | Cheyenne G Wilson | Oelrichs, SD 57763 | $7,904 |
110 | Kelly Wade Boomer | Martin, SD 57551 | $7,803 |
111 | William J Kuhl III | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $7,460 |
112 | Coy Francis Fisher | Scenic, SD 57780 | $7,210 |
113 | , | $7,135 | |
114 | Shawn Richards | Pine Ridge, SD 57770 | $6,884 |
115 | Cody James Ferguson | Martin, SD 57551 | $6,476 |
116 | Dave Janis | Manderson, SD 57756 | $6,467 |
117 | Leonard William Ferguson | Kyle, SD 57752 | $6,445 |
118 | John Marcus Hussman | Pine Ridge, SD 57770 | $6,253 |
119 | Kelly Ferguson | Kyle, SD 57752 | $6,021 |
120 | , | $5,884 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”