Farm Subsidy information
Shannon County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Shannon County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 209
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shannon County, South Dakota totaled $5,163,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Melvin Kocer | Porcupine, SD 57772 | $5,856 |
122 | , | $5,474 | |
123 | Heidi Ellen Cuny | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $5,458 |
124 | Tyler Duane Lunderman | Porcupine, SD 57772 | $5,393 |
125 | Kristine L Novak | Martin, SD 57551 | $5,363 |
126 | Karen Twiss | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $4,895 |
127 | Donald Curtis Buffington Jr | Red Shirt, SD 57744 | $4,808 |
128 | Marcell Dean Bull Bear | Kyle, SD 57752 | $4,668 |
129 | Maxie Ann Bair | Martin, SD 57551 | $4,545 |
130 | Walter James Martinez Jr | Kyle, SD 57752 | $4,315 |
131 | Vincent Pilcher | Kyle, SD 57752 | $4,201 |
132 | Marr Cummings | Porcupine, SD 57772 | $4,122 |
133 | Maurice D Twiss | Buffalo Gap, SD 57722 | $4,069 |
134 | Darrell Yellow Hair | Batesland, SD 57716 | $3,984 |
135 | Evry May | Kyle, SD 57752 | $3,953 |
136 | Sandra G Buffington | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $3,925 |
137 | Karmen Townsend | Bastrop, TX 78602 | $3,725 |
138 | John Novak | Gillette, WY 82718 | $3,422 |
139 | Mary Iron Cloud | Porcupine, SD 57772 | $3,252 |
140 | Derek P Hunter | Kyle, SD 57752 | $3,171 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”