Loan Deficiency in Shannon County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 111
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Shannon County, South Dakota totaled $1,419,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larry Swick | Gordon, NE 69343 | $13,298 |
22 | William T Ziegenbein | Piedmont, SD 57769 | $12,509 |
23 | Loren Swick | Greeley, CO 80634 | $12,439 |
24 | Vern Sager | Gordon, NE 69343 | $11,135 |
25 | Magnuson Sd Ltd | Martin, SD 57551 | $10,464 |
26 | Arlan Wipf Estate | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $9,961 |
27 | Larry Kehn | Batesland, SD 57716 | $9,895 |
28 | Winston Nelson | Gordon, NE 69343 | $9,790 |
29 | Marion Schultz | Batesland, SD 57716 | $8,699 |
30 | D & S Hansen Farms Inc | Hemingford, NE 69348 | $8,533 |
31 | Arlan Wipf | Black Hawk, SD 57718 | $8,168 |
32 | Glenn E Shepardson | Martin, SD 57551 | $7,825 |
33 | Burney Farms | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $7,650 |
34 | Stewart Hagman | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $6,481 |
35 | Charles Divan | Martin, SD 57551 | $6,464 |
36 | Harold Earl Sauser | Chadron, NE 69337 | $6,064 |
37 | Stuart Allen Johnson | Rushville, NE 69360 | $5,842 |
38 | Lu Elwood | Omaha, NE 68145 | $5,631 |
39 | Shirley Ann Johnson | Rushville, NE 69360 | $5,586 |
40 | Mary Harris | Palmyra, NE 68418 | $5,534 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”