Total Conservation Programs in Spink County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 525
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $4,164,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gross Properties | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $76,325 |
2 | Bonnie Siebrecht Robinson Trust 2017 | Redfield, SD 57469 | $70,455 |
3 | Bixler Farms | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $65,652 |
4 | Larry Joseph Rahm | Doland, SD 57436 | $60,830 |
5 | Heber Family Trust | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $50,000 |
6 | Kathy Kohnen | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $44,416 |
7 | Larry Kohnen | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $44,416 |
8 | Kathleen Olsen | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $43,899 |
9 | Steven C Smith | Northville, SD 57465 | $42,513 |
10 | William Troske | Turton, SD 57477 | $41,724 |
11 | Ronald Worlie | Conde, SD 57434 | $41,551 |
12 | James E Peterson | Lake Havasu City, AZ 86406 | $40,861 |
13 | Shirley Solheim | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $40,119 |
14 | Barbara R Erickson | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $39,430 |
15 | , | $39,127 | |
16 | Worlie Farms LLC | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $38,592 |
17 | Michael Odaniel | Athol, SD 57424 | $37,334 |
18 | Todd Paul Hofer | Doland, SD 57436 | $35,862 |
19 | Linda Terpstra | Doland, SD 57436 | $35,208 |
20 | Greg Peterson | Conde, SD 57434 | $32,175 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>