Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Spink County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 67
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $219,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kurt A Vanvleet | Redfield, SD 57469 | $3,678 |
22 | Jerald J Kamen | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $3,500 |
23 | Susan J Luzier Kamen | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $3,500 |
24 | Tyler Burton | Redfield, SD 57469 | $3,021 |
25 | Garrett Rahm | Turton, SD 57477 | $2,915 |
26 | Swanson Farms Wd, LLC. | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $2,631 |
27 | Ryan Alan Huizenga | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $2,427 |
28 | Korey D Lambert | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $2,341 |
29 | Guy Hanlon | Verdon, SD 57434 | $2,268 |
30 | Karen Peterson | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $2,193 |
31 | Lenny Peterson | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $2,193 |
32 | Helen Sue Mitchell | Wills Point, TX 75169 | $2,098 |
33 | Mitchell Eric Peterson | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $1,970 |
34 | Miranda Jae Peterson | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $1,970 |
35 | Robert Sparling | Athol, SD 57424 | $1,938 |
36 | Christopher Kelley | Arvada, CO 80002 | $1,880 |
37 | Bobbie Gatzke | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $1,780 |
38 | Allen Gatzke | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $1,780 |
39 | Hal Fortin | Conde, SD 57434 | $1,702 |
40 | Ronnie Dale Gilbert | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $1,413 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”