Conservation Reserve Program in Spink County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 532
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $3,342,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daniel Appel | Redfield, SD 57469 | $30,311 |
22 | Mary Labrie | Doland, SD 57436 | $28,411 |
23 | Wayne Matheny | Leesburg, FL 34788 | $28,168 |
24 | Adele Flanery | Huron, SD 57350 | $27,334 |
25 | Carolyn Brink | Denver, CO 80210 | $27,287 |
26 | Robert Louis Tennis | Conde, SD 57434 | $27,061 |
27 | Richard Thelen | Redfield, SD 57469 | $26,127 |
28 | Lenny Peterson | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $25,442 |
29 | David K Nelson | Redfield, SD 57469 | $24,030 |
30 | Michael Ray Binger | Tulare, SD 57476 | $23,538 |
31 | James Boekelheide | Northville, SD 57465 | $22,479 |
32 | Danette Peterson | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $21,904 |
33 | Danny Booze | Ashton, SD 57424 | $21,342 |
34 | David A Wolsky | Watertown, SD 57201 | $20,641 |
35 | Curtis Albert Rahm | Turton, SD 57477 | $20,456 |
36 | Max & Heidi Williams Limited Partnership | Brentford, SD 57429 | $20,300 |
37 | Jeffery Odaniel | Redfield, SD 57469 | $20,160 |
38 | John P Odaniel | Redfield, SD 57469 | $20,067 |
39 | George A Rahm | Doland, SD 57436 | $19,788 |
40 | Barbara R Erickson | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $19,715 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”