Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Spink County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 249
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $217,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daniel Peterson | Northville, SD 57465 | $2,305 |
22 | Kenneth John Nowell | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $2,279 |
23 | Tyler Burton | Redfield, SD 57469 | $2,232 |
24 | Roy Eldon Buchholz | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $2,204 |
25 | Albert Ray Williams | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $2,098 |
26 | Bottum Brothers Partnership | Tulare, SD 57476 | $2,093 |
27 | George A Rahm | Doland, SD 57436 | $2,086 |
28 | Reese Wagner | Redfield, SD 57469 | $2,032 |
29 | Michael Jungwirth | Athol, SD 57424 | $1,948 |
30 | Deyoung Partnership LLC | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $1,928 |
31 | Troske Land And Cattle Inc | Turton, SD 57477 | $1,843 |
32 | Brett Terrence Binger | Tulare, SD 57476 | $1,817 |
33 | Daniel Enander | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $1,769 |
34 | Adam Wright | Turton, SD 57477 | $1,657 |
35 | David Masat | Redfield, SD 57469 | $1,654 |
36 | Alan Neitzel | Redfield, SD 57469 | $1,647 |
37 | , | $1,602 | |
38 | Jade Robert Jandel | Redfield, SD 57469 | $1,587 |
39 | Brooker Farms | Tulare, SD 57476 | $1,582 |
40 | Dwight Lyren | Conde, SD 57434 | $1,553 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”