Conservation Reserve Program in Spink County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,310
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $69,014,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Robert Louis Tennis | Conde, SD 57434 | $227,738 |
62 | Robert Alan Erickson | Piedmont, SD 57769 | $227,227 |
63 | John P Odaniel | Redfield, SD 57469 | $225,771 |
64 | Dale Eugene Washnok | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $224,389 |
65 | Randy Michael Hausvik | Conde, SD 57434 | $222,922 |
66 | Fred D Brink | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $220,270 |
67 | William Troske | Turton, SD 57477 | $219,623 |
68 | Arlo Clemensen | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $217,158 |
69 | Twin Creeks Inc | Turton, SD 57477 | $213,123 |
70 | Gary Dean Wipf | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $210,984 |
71 | Carol Anne Wipf | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $210,979 |
72 | Norbert Hearnen | Conde, SD 57434 | $210,465 |
73 | Curtis Albert Rahm | Turton, SD 57477 | $207,391 |
74 | Danny Peterson | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $207,071 |
75 | Terry A Wicks | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $206,133 |
76 | Raymond Steinbis Living Trust | Sycamore, IL 60178 | $204,663 |
77 | Hoellein Farms | Northville, SD 57465 | $201,065 |
78 | Richard Worlie | Conde, SD 57434 | $198,400 |
79 | Donald T Labrie | Bluffton, SC 29909 | $195,073 |
80 | Robert Dean Schultz | Tulare, SD 57476 | $194,202 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”