Direct Payment Program in Spink County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,363
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $66,429,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lee Gatzke | Tulare, SD 57476 | $232,591 |
62 | Ulla Gatzke | Tulare, SD 57476 | $232,591 |
63 | Reid William Mayer | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $232,530 |
64 | Peterson Farms | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $230,427 |
65 | Mason-knox Ranch Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $230,153 |
66 | Curtis Albert Rahm | Turton, SD 57477 | $229,656 |
67 | Gary Bernard Hearnen | Conde, SD 57434 | $227,547 |
68 | Leslie Richard Little | Mellette, SD 57461 | $225,900 |
69 | Larry Joseph Rahm | Doland, SD 57436 | $225,187 |
70 | Michael Hausvik | Turton, SD 57477 | $225,044 |
71 | Brett Terrence Binger | Tulare, SD 57476 | $220,495 |
72 | Spirit Ridge Inc | Ashton, SD 57424 | $219,408 |
73 | Belmont Hutterian Brethren Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $218,272 |
74 | Thomas Dean Gilbert | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $216,504 |
75 | S & K Farms Inc | Northville, SD 57465 | $215,556 |
76 | Darin Edward Binger | Tulare, SD 57476 | $214,385 |
77 | Myron Hammer | Mellette, SD 57461 | $209,947 |
78 | Allen Spear | Ashton, SD 57424 | $207,080 |
79 | Ronald Wayne Starr | Doland, SD 57436 | $206,909 |
80 | Joseph A Henjum | Conde, SD 57434 | $205,944 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”