Production Flexibility Program in Spink County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1,001 to 1,020 of 1,452
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $39,016,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1001 | Evelyn M Clausen | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $2,946 |
1002 | Russell Buising | Conde, SD 57434 | $2,945 |
1003 | Dale Buising | Watertown, SD 57201 | $2,944 |
1004 | Fred Lawrence | Florence, SD 57235 | $2,932 |
1005 | Doris V Koch Tr No 132 | Graymont, IL 61743 | $2,919 |
1006 | Ergeine Luxton | Redfield, SD 57469 | $2,910 |
1007 | Robert Hendren / | Elgin, IL 60124 | $2,902 |
1008 | Vernon E Bau | Redfield, SD 57469 | $2,902 |
1009 | Melvin Bau | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $2,890 |
1010 | Jared James Woodring | Athol, SD 57424 | $2,890 |
1011 | Harold Brink / | Redfield, SD 57469 | $2,889 |
1012 | Fordham Hutterian Brethren Inc | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $2,883 |
1013 | Matt Rathjen | Huron, SD 57350 | $2,866 |
1014 | Hazel Kitzman / | Minneapolis, MN 55432 | $2,856 |
1015 | Duaine - Duaine Zens Zens | Zell, SD 57469 | $2,834 |
1016 | Patricia Mitchell | Brentford, SD 57429 | $2,823 |
1017 | Barbara Guild | Carson City, NV 89703 | $2,811 |
1018 | Kathryn A Kay | Carson City, NV 89703 | $2,807 |
1019 | Robert Quimby | Carson City, NV 89703 | $2,807 |
1020 | Eldwin Taylor / | Conde, SD 57434 | $2,785 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”