Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Spink County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 627
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $28,683,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ronnie Frericks | Northville, SD 57465 | $71,506 |
122 | Glade Cattle Company LLC | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $70,180 |
123 | Darin Edward Binger | Tulare, SD 57476 | $69,826 |
124 | Alex Mitchell | Mellette, SD 57461 | $69,518 |
125 | Chelle & Nate Inc | Brentford, SD 57429 | $69,514 |
126 | Austin J Binger | Tulare, SD 57476 | $67,915 |
127 | B & P Schneider Inc | Turton, SD 57477 | $67,824 |
128 | Aaron Thomas Gilbert | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $67,712 |
129 | Jason Mccomsey | Conde, SD 57434 | $67,130 |
130 | Scott Binger | Tulare, SD 57476 | $66,466 |
131 | Joseph Matthew Mayer | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $65,885 |
132 | Gary Dean Wipf | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $65,746 |
133 | Vanderwal Livestock Inc | Brentford, SD 57429 | $65,669 |
134 | James Dean Smith | Conde, SD 57434 | $65,309 |
135 | Belmont Hutterian Brethren Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $65,271 |
136 | Eric Thorson | Mansfield, SD 57460 | $64,891 |
137 | David Thorson | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $64,348 |
138 | Daniel Peterson | Northville, SD 57465 | $64,324 |
139 | David Jessen | Redfield, SD 57469 | $64,042 |
140 | Joseph A Henjum | Conde, SD 57434 | $63,742 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”