Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Spink County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 560
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $10,065,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Mark J Fischbach | Mellette, SD 57461 | $25,238 |
142 | Edwin Fischbach | Mellette, SD 57461 | $25,012 |
143 | Robert Louis Tennis | Conde, SD 57434 | $24,893 |
144 | Dustin Schmidt | Redfield, SD 57469 | $24,873 |
145 | Masat Inc | Redfield, SD 57469 | $24,406 |
146 | Hoellein Farms | Northville, SD 57465 | $24,390 |
147 | Woodward Farms Inc | Tulare, SD 57476 | $24,352 |
148 | Wayne Frericks | Northville, SD 57465 | $24,079 |
149 | Randy Michael Hausvik | Conde, SD 57434 | $24,050 |
150 | Vanderwal Livestock Inc | Brentford, SD 57429 | $23,974 |
151 | Calvert Creek Farms LLC | Athol, SD 57424 | $23,947 |
152 | Jordan T Hansen | Redfield, SD 57469 | $23,724 |
153 | Joseph Matthew Mayer | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $23,724 |
154 | Dale Dennis Smith | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $23,553 |
155 | Scott Ellison Haskell | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $23,188 |
156 | Vicky Ann Haskell | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $23,188 |
157 | James Dean Smith | Conde, SD 57434 | $23,145 |
158 | Myron Jeschke | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $23,143 |
159 | Rebecca Jeschke | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $23,143 |
160 | Double G Farms General Partnership | Turton, SD 57477 | $23,011 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”