Counter Cyclical Program in Spink County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 900
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $11,047,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Clemensen Farms Inc | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $51,091 |
42 | Mason-knox Ranch Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $50,583 |
43 | Clark Hutt Breth Inc | Raymond, SD 57258 | $50,174 |
44 | Bradley John Morgan | Mellette, SD 57461 | $49,861 |
45 | Stuck Inc | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $49,679 |
46 | Clayton Harold Kloss | Tulare, SD 57476 | $49,543 |
47 | S & K Farms Inc | Northville, SD 57465 | $47,344 |
48 | Michael Ray Binger | Tulare, SD 57476 | $46,770 |
49 | Larry Albert Wipf | Doland, SD 57436 | $45,324 |
50 | Lonnie Allen Wipf | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $44,830 |
51 | Hansen Farms | Turton, SD 57477 | $44,792 |
52 | Dettler Farms / | Doland, SD 57436 | $44,610 |
53 | William Hervie Watson | Huron, SD 57350 | $44,536 |
54 | Hofer-loewen Farm Inc | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $43,849 |
55 | James Boekelheide | Northville, SD 57465 | $42,421 |
56 | Dry Run Farms Inc | Conde, SD 57434 | $42,389 |
57 | Gary Dean Wipf | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $42,156 |
58 | Carol Anne Wipf | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $42,156 |
59 | K Olson Inc | Sioux Falls, SD 57101 | $41,684 |
60 | Thomas Dean Gilbert | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $41,581 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”