Total Emergency Relief Program in Spink County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 504
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $18,753,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bottum Brothers Partnership | Tulare, SD 57476 | $546,440 |
2 | Bixler Farms | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $439,296 |
3 | Esser Farms Inc | Redfield, SD 57469 | $308,399 |
4 | Red Ash Ranch Inc | Ashton, SD 57424 | $280,703 |
5 | Hahler Farms Inc | Ashton, SD 57424 | $268,684 |
6 | Boekelheide Farms Inc | Northville, SD 57465 | $251,744 |
7 | Klebsch Farms Inc | Redfield, SD 57469 | $237,412 |
8 | Vicki Kegler | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $226,129 |
9 | Scott Kenneth Dawson | Redfield, SD 57469 | $221,228 |
10 | Tolvstad Farms Inc | Mellette, SD 57461 | $218,627 |
11 | S & K Farms Inc | Northville, SD 57465 | $182,366 |
12 | Wayne Binger | Tulare, SD 57476 | $171,902 |
13 | Wal-di Inc | Mellette, SD 57461 | $168,916 |
14 | Nolan Jadell Wipf | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $160,660 |
15 | Janet Gary Tschetter | Doland, SD 57436 | $156,603 |
16 | Myron Jeschke | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $154,364 |
17 | Rebecca Jeschke | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $154,364 |
18 | Donald Miles Jr | Doland, SD 57436 | $152,294 |
19 | Rex Herman Binger | Redfield, SD 57469 | $143,967 |
20 | Hoellein Farms | Northville, SD 57465 | $141,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>