Farm Subsidy information
Spink County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Spink County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,076
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $866,439,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Glendale Hutterian Brethren Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $4,363,369 |
2 | Spink Hutterian Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $3,959,801 |
3 | Hillside Hutterian Brethren | Doland, SD 57436 | $3,915,795 |
4 | Bixler Farms | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $3,842,379 |
5 | Gatzke Farms Partnership | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $3,214,780 |
6 | Noethlich Bros | Doland, SD 57436 | $3,125,643 |
7 | Mendel Farms Partnership | Doland, SD 57436 | $3,066,282 |
8 | Clark Hutt Breth Inc | Raymond, SD 57258 | $3,008,141 |
9 | Armadale Farms Inc | Mellette, SD 57461 | $2,900,286 |
10 | Camrose Hutterian Brethren Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $2,706,271 |
11 | Esser Farms Inc | Redfield, SD 57469 | $2,612,664 |
12 | Bottum Brothers Partnership | Tulare, SD 57476 | $2,589,813 |
13 | Robert Irwin Meier | Doland, SD 57436 | $2,415,861 |
14 | Klebsch Farms Inc | Redfield, SD 57469 | $2,319,704 |
15 | R & B Mielke Inc | Conde, SD 57434 | $2,255,566 |
16 | Belle Plaine Hutterian Brethren I | Doland, SD 57436 | $2,233,418 |
17 | Clemensen Farms Inc | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $2,072,250 |
18 | Boekelheide Farms Inc | Northville, SD 57465 | $2,045,037 |
19 | Todd Paul Hofer | Doland, SD 57436 | $1,956,542 |
20 | K Olson Inc | Sioux Falls, SD 57101 | $1,917,644 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>