Farm Subsidy information
Stanley County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Stanley County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 242
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $16,993,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R & D Tibbs Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $68,766 |
22 | Aaron S Brewer | Hayes, SD 57537 | $67,888 |
23 | Marty Norman | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $67,328 |
24 | Mike Norman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $64,483 |
25 | Tom Zander | Pierre, SD 57501 | $63,348 |
26 | Bg Productions | Midland, SD 57552 | $63,316 |
27 | Michael L Mcquistion | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $61,712 |
28 | Tyler J Stoeser | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $58,062 |
29 | Kylan Meier | Alpena, SD 57312 | $57,178 |
30 | Ashley Meier | Alpena, SD 57312 | $57,178 |
31 | Larry Mcquistion | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $56,345 |
32 | James Carter | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $56,150 |
33 | Timothy Nemec | Midland, SD 57552 | $54,294 |
34 | Trent D Stroup | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $53,916 |
35 | Frank Iversen | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $53,301 |
36 | Clinton L Caldwell | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $52,628 |
37 | Kyle Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $52,194 |
38 | Dana E Iversen | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $51,981 |
39 | James Carlisle | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $50,700 |
40 | Martha A Stewart | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $50,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”