Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 147
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $3,411,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Darren G Tibbs | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $28,690 |
42 | Roger Theobald | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $28,569 |
43 | 3j Cattle Company LLC | Midland, SD 57552 | $28,180 |
44 | Tyler J Stoeser | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $27,592 |
45 | Richard Alan Siedschlaw | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $26,957 |
46 | Terry Beastrom | Pierre, SD 57501 | $26,949 |
47 | Leonda Beastrom Estate | Pierre, SD 57501 | $26,949 |
48 | Ron Mcquistion | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $26,846 |
49 | Casey Doud | Midland, SD 57552 | $25,999 |
50 | Bruce Mathews | Draper, SD 57531 | $25,726 |
51 | Chantry Norman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $24,878 |
52 | Blake M Norman | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $24,747 |
53 | Kyle Tibbs | Mission Ridge, SD 57532 | $24,430 |
54 | Eric P Nordstrom | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $23,693 |
55 | Rick Hall | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $23,368 |
56 | Angela J Doolittle | Midland, SD 57552 | $23,264 |
57 | Levi B Tibbs | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $22,671 |
58 | Frank Iversen | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $21,255 |
59 | Ronald Doud | Midland, SD 57552 | $21,073 |
60 | Billy Wyly | Okaton, SD 57562 | $20,029 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”