Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 92
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $947,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lois Thompson | Pierre, SD 57501 | $6,182 |
42 | Springview Ranches Inc | Hayes, SD 57537 | $5,903 |
43 | Frank Iversen | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $5,575 |
44 | Clayton R Roberts | Pierre, SD 57501 | $5,521 |
45 | Dana E Iversen | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $5,061 |
46 | Jacob R Fanger | Hayes, SD 57537 | $4,587 |
47 | Tim & Diane Olson Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $4,528 |
48 | Iva Wyly Russell | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $4,470 |
49 | Frank Hall | Midland, SD 57552 | $4,178 |
50 | Helmet Reuer | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $4,050 |
51 | Hedman Farm East LLC | Pierre, SD 57501 | $3,832 |
52 | Norman J Stoeser | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,743 |
53 | Brit Miller | Philip, SD 57567 | $3,742 |
54 | Wilcox Grass Creek Ranch Limited | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,488 |
55 | Taylor Sonnenschein | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,252 |
56 | Christensen Livestock Co Llp | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $3,188 |
57 | Blake M Norman | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,108 |
58 | Brittani Lyn Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,098 |
59 | Roger Theobald | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,058 |
60 | Gene Stoeser | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,985 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”