Farm Subsidy information
Stanley County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 806
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $260,241,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Johnson Family Farms | Platte, SD 57369 | $667,644 |
62 | Robert D Coverdale | Midland, SD 57552 | $666,758 |
63 | Cody Smith | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $664,460 |
64 | Triple U Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $659,797 |
65 | Bobby And A Darlene Jones Ptn | Groom, TX 79039 | $657,355 |
66 | Trent D Stroup | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $654,491 |
67 | Kroeplin Farms General Partnership | Highmore, SD 57345 | $640,733 |
68 | Richard Doud | Midland, SD 57552 | $623,721 |
69 | Tom Zander | Pierre, SD 57501 | $597,691 |
70 | Mike Norman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $593,924 |
71 | Keith E Jennings | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $585,899 |
72 | R E Turner | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $584,060 |
73 | Weak End Ranch | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $577,212 |
74 | Arthur C Bergeson Jr | Pierre, SD 57501 | $568,096 |
75 | Christensen Livestock Co Llp | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $559,656 |
76 | Femur Farms LLC | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $542,278 |
77 | Eric D Slaathaug | Pierre, SD 57501 | $542,231 |
78 | Springview Ranches Inc | Hayes, SD 57537 | $535,055 |
79 | Sarah Faulstich-pazour | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $530,333 |
80 | Iva Wyly Russell | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $528,698 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”