Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Stanley County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 101
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $1,789,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Shad Tyler Riggle | Hayes, SD 57537 | $3,951 |
82 | Aaron S Brewer | Hayes, SD 57537 | $3,420 |
83 | Hicks Properties LLC | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,354 |
84 | Cody Nickolas | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,309 |
85 | Chad C Stoeser | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,198 |
86 | Chris Fosheim | Midland, SD 57552 | $2,976 |
87 | Zane A Pries | Pierre, SD 57501 | $2,930 |
88 | Joanne Heckenlaible | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,794 |
89 | Dwight A Husted | Harrold, SD 57536 | $2,454 |
90 | Clinton L Caldwell | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,415 |
91 | Brittani Lyn Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,286 |
92 | Bruce Kessler | Pierre, SD 57501 | $2,213 |
93 | Dakota Dreamers Partnership | Midland, SD 57552 | $2,151 |
94 | Jay Pearson | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,150 |
95 | Michael Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,095 |
96 | Dena Kinsella | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,989 |
97 | Gerald J Kessler | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,797 |
98 | Crystal Dianne Neuharth | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,562 |
99 | Colton August Maier | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,346 |
100 | Levi Neuharth | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,263 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”