Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 150
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $4,239,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gaylord Norman | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,400 |
102 | Double J Cattle Co LLC | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $4,070 |
103 | Jessica M Ludemann | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,960 |
104 | Joanne Heckenlaible | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,958 |
105 | Kevin Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,850 |
106 | Bryce Baker | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,850 |
107 | Matt Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,795 |
108 | Diana Melvin | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,605 |
109 | Patrick Dougherty | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,465 |
110 | Dave Dahl | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,465 |
111 | Chris Hatheway | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,355 |
112 | Brittani Lyn Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,351 |
113 | James Dougherty | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,245 |
114 | Vernon Ray Sivage | Pierre, SD 57501 | $2,970 |
115 | Marli Scarborough | Hayes, SD 57537 | $2,970 |
116 | Hicks Properties LLC | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,915 |
117 | Rodney Geppert | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,805 |
118 | Shaun Rausch | Brookings, SD 57006 | $2,801 |
119 | Jay Pearson | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,695 |
120 | Kip Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,695 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”