Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 186
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $2,338,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Robert K Clair Jr | Pierre, SD 57501 | $3,772 |
102 | Dave Dahl | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,676 |
103 | Terry Schofield | Midland, SD 57552 | $3,628 |
104 | Art Carter | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $3,596 |
105 | Eldon Harvey | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,563 |
106 | Chad Olson | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,526 |
107 | Coy Reinhard | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,394 |
108 | John L Smith | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,358 |
109 | Taylor Sonnenschein | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,324 |
110 | Levi Neuharth | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,321 |
111 | Jay Pearson | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,194 |
112 | Kevin Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,097 |
113 | Gerald J Kessler | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,012 |
114 | Rounds & Scarborough Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $2,998 |
115 | James Lawhon | Ft Rierre, SD 57532 | $2,959 |
116 | Sharon Roseland | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,921 |
117 | Steve Hedman | Midland, SD 57552 | $2,751 |
118 | Larry Andersen | Hayes, SD 57537 | $2,688 |
119 | Carmen Alleman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $2,385 |
120 | Clinton C Alleman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $2,384 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”