Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 147
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $3,411,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Joanne Heckenlaible | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,352 |
122 | Casey Hannum | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,166 |
123 | Ali T Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,161 |
124 | Bailey Jo Ricketts | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,029 |
125 | Lance Creek Ranch LLC | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $3,002 |
126 | Gaylord Sonnenschein | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,907 |
127 | Michael Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,873 |
128 | Pamela Haag | Hayes, SD 57537 | $2,705 |
129 | Monte Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,689 |
130 | Stran Harrison Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,612 |
131 | Jacob R Fanger | Hayes, SD 57537 | $2,588 |
132 | Adam Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,475 |
133 | Kady R Nielsen | Draper, SD 57531 | $2,434 |
134 | Diana Melvin | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,861 |
135 | Rk Nielsen Partnership | Draper, SD 57531 | $1,654 |
136 | Jordan Ann Buchanan | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,523 |
137 | Florence Hapney | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,364 |
138 | Devern Peck | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,244 |
139 | Tatum Claire Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,188 |
140 | Kyle Hollingsworth | Pierre, SD 57501 | $1,005 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”