Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 150
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $4,239,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Clinton L Caldwell | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,530 |
122 | Steven L Andersen | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,475 |
123 | Soren John Iversen | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,475 |
124 | Trent Manecke | Midland, SD 57552 | $2,365 |
125 | Dean M. Raymond | Pierre, SD 57501 | $2,255 |
126 | Pamela Haag | Hayes, SD 57537 | $1,898 |
127 | Casey Hannum | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,815 |
128 | Bailey Jo Ricketts | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,815 |
129 | Michael Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,760 |
130 | Anita J Hostetler | Bloomington, MN 55437 | $1,727 |
131 | Rodney J Stoeser | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,650 |
132 | Andrew J Bruce | Pierre, SD 57501 | $1,650 |
133 | C. L. May Homestead Llp | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $1,569 |
134 | Jacob Olson | Hayes, SD 57537 | $1,540 |
135 | Jacob R Fanger | Hayes, SD 57537 | $1,485 |
136 | Seth S Norman | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,485 |
137 | Monte Scott | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,210 |
138 | Martha A Stewart | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,210 |
139 | Brody Lane Andersen | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $935 |
140 | Florence Hapney | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $880 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”