Farm Subsidy information
Stanley County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Stanley County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 269
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $12,967,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Providence Inc | Onida, SD 57564 | $7,888 |
142 | Elaine Whitepipe | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $7,722 |
143 | Scarborough Fam Land Lmtd Ptshp | Hayes, SD 57537 | $7,321 |
144 | T J Farms Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $7,146 |
145 | Monica Cusimano | Woodland, CA 95695 | $7,082 |
146 | Lori Maddocks Carter | Woodland, CA 95695 | $7,082 |
147 | Matt Eldridge | Pierre, SD 57501 | $7,066 |
148 | Joanne Heckenlaible | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $6,878 |
149 | Philip Meyers | Pierre, SD 57501 | $6,859 |
150 | Kyle Tibbs | Mission Ridge, SD 57532 | $6,643 |
151 | C & E Rausch Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $6,608 |
152 | Aaron S Brewer | Hayes, SD 57537 | $6,556 |
153 | Sand Creek Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $6,410 |
154 | David Iversen | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $6,269 |
155 | Alfred D Slaathaug | Brandon, SD 57005 | $6,228 |
156 | Levi B Tibbs | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $6,134 |
157 | Paul Mccarty | Pierre, SD 57501 | $5,951 |
158 | Mccarty Family Lllp | Missoula, MT 59803 | $5,951 |
159 | Michael S Bergeson | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $5,691 |
160 | Dena Merchen | Powder Springs, GA 30127 | $5,598 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”