Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Stanley County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 130
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $808,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mortenson Cattle Co LLC | Hayes, SD 57537 | $51,695 |
2 | Robert C Calkins | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $36,894 |
3 | Sarah Faulstich-pazour | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $32,876 |
4 | Scott Pazour | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $32,851 |
5 | Kyle Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $26,594 |
6 | W L Thompson Ranch Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $23,628 |
7 | Carlson Cattle Co LLC | Keenesburg, CO 80643 | $20,349 |
8 | Clint L Alleman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $20,081 |
9 | Carson James Carlisle | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $17,921 |
10 | Marc Russell Scarborough | Hayes, SD 57537 | $17,529 |
11 | Triple S Farms Partnership | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $15,424 |
12 | Christensen Livestock Co Llp | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $14,229 |
13 | Clifford Tibbs | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $13,968 |
14 | Prince & Sons Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $13,921 |
15 | R & M Rose Ranch | Hayes, SD 57537 | $12,659 |
16 | Mork Norman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $12,369 |
17 | Jamie Kirkpatrick | Midland, SD 57552 | $11,626 |
18 | Wacey Kirkpatrick | Midland, SD 57552 | $11,626 |
19 | Tom Zander | Pierre, SD 57501 | $11,592 |
20 | R & D Tibbs Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $11,431 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>