Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 150
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $4,239,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tim & Diane Olson Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $310,663 |
2 | Marc Russell Scarborough | Hayes, SD 57537 | $171,194 |
3 | Mortenson Cattle Co LLC | Hayes, SD 57537 | $148,305 |
4 | Triple S Farms Partnership | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $142,083 |
5 | Clint L Alleman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $134,464 |
6 | Bentshoe Farms Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $133,132 |
7 | Chad Olson | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $122,585 |
8 | Willow Creek Jv | Pierre, SD 57501 | $115,918 |
9 | Bg Productions | Midland, SD 57552 | $104,067 |
10 | Todd Jones | Hayes, SD 57537 | $96,911 |
11 | Mork Norman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $96,506 |
12 | Roger Theobald | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $94,160 |
13 | Leonda Beastrom Estate | Pierre, SD 57501 | $90,830 |
14 | Scott Pazour | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $79,382 |
15 | Zay Norman Family Ranch LLC | Hayes, SD 57537 | $79,253 |
16 | W L Thompson Ranch Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $73,276 |
17 | Terry Beastrom | Pierre, SD 57501 | $67,273 |
18 | Robert C Calkins | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $66,761 |
19 | Sarah Faulstich-pazour | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $64,106 |
20 | Eric D Slaathaug | Pierre, SD 57501 | $58,169 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>