Counter Cyclical Program in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 143
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $536,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rex & Leann Haskins Joint Venture | Pierre, SD 57501 | $50,494 |
| 2 | Lnl Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $48,682 |
| 3 | Prince & Sons Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $40,925 |
| 4 | Prairie View Farms Partnership | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $38,972 |
| 5 | Deadwood Trail Ranch | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $35,178 |
| 6 | The Stoeser Family Trust | Pierre, SD 57501 | $19,532 |
| 7 | Clarence Maxwell Jones | Hayes, SD 57537 | $16,894 |
| 8 | Lower Brule Farm Corp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $14,653 |
| 9 | Hand Bros Ptr | Midland, SD 57552 | $12,457 |
| 10 | Gaylord Norman | Pierre, SD 57501 | $11,103 |
| 11 | Marc Russell Scarborough | Hayes, SD 57537 | $10,373 |
| 12 | Richard Thompson | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $10,063 |
| 13 | Rose Ranch Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $10,050 |
| 14 | Delores Miller | Pierre, SD 57501 | $8,869 |
| 15 | Kim Marlin Brakke | Presho, SD 57568 | $8,531 |
| 16 | David J Neuharth | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $7,858 |
| 17 | Durkin Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $7,448 |
| 18 | Clark & Carmen Alleman Partnershi | Hayes, SD 57537 | $7,378 |
| 19 | Terry Beastrom | Pierre, SD 57501 | $7,223 |
| 20 | Leonda Beastrom Estate | Pierre, SD 57501 | $7,222 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
