Conservation Reserve Program in Stanley County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 112
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $1,762,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | R & M Rose Ranch | Hayes, SD 57537 | $84,462 |
2 | Marty Norman | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $50,000 |
3 | Mike Norman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $50,000 |
4 | 3j Cattle Company LLC | Midland, SD 57552 | $50,000 |
5 | Martha A Stewart | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $50,000 |
6 | Michael L Mcquistion | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $48,798 |
7 | Ronald Doud | Midland, SD 57552 | $48,160 |
8 | Zay Norman Family Ranch LLC | Hayes, SD 57537 | $47,925 |
9 | Larry Mcquistion | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $47,876 |
10 | , | $46,616 | |
11 | James Carlisle | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $46,032 |
12 | Shanard Husted | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $45,956 |
13 | R & D Tibbs Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $43,492 |
14 | Dana E Iversen | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $42,879 |
15 | , | $42,879 | |
16 | W L Thompson Ranch Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $42,599 |
17 | Frank Iversen | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $40,738 |
18 | Casey Doud | Midland, SD 57552 | $39,299 |
19 | Vernon Ray Sivage | Pierre, SD 57501 | $39,061 |
20 | Cmc Farms LLC | Oro Valley, AZ 85737 | $36,407 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>