Total Disaster Programs in Stanley County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 147
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $3,057,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lower Brule Farm Corp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $426,371 |
2 | Mortenson Cattle Co LLC | Hayes, SD 57537 | $156,641 |
3 | Tim & Diane Olson Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $146,845 |
4 | Marc Russell Scarborough | Hayes, SD 57537 | $142,975 |
5 | Scott Pazour | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $142,175 |
6 | Prince & Sons Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $115,328 |
7 | Zay Norman Family Ranch LLC | Hayes, SD 57537 | $87,302 |
8 | Don Kirkpatrick | Midland, SD 57552 | $80,315 |
9 | Carlson Cattle Co LLC | Keenesburg, CO 80643 | $78,639 |
10 | Clint L Alleman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $69,650 |
11 | Aaron S Brewer | Hayes, SD 57537 | $65,216 |
12 | 3j Cattle Company LLC | Midland, SD 57552 | $63,207 |
13 | Tom Zander | Pierre, SD 57501 | $63,071 |
14 | Triple S Farms Partnership | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $58,461 |
15 | Timothy Nemec | Midland, SD 57552 | $49,588 |
16 | Ron Mcquistion | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $44,927 |
17 | Trent D Stroup | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $43,902 |
18 | Tyler J Stoeser | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $43,752 |
19 | W L Thompson Ranch Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $39,343 |
20 | Bg Productions | Midland, SD 57552 | $36,834 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>