Loan Deficiency in Sully County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 596
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Sully County, South Dakota totaled $30,604,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | V & T Asmussen Farms | Pierre, SD 57501 | $252,088 |
22 | Mundt Bros Inc | Agar, SD 57520 | $249,752 |
23 | Dean Nelson | Onida, SD 57564 | $248,126 |
24 | Kirk F Yackley | Onida, SD 57564 | $244,725 |
25 | Beverly G Ebert | Onida, SD 57564 | $242,723 |
26 | James Ogle | Harrold, SD 57536 | $239,567 |
27 | Arthur Michael Bollweg | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $235,830 |
28 | Jeffrey Bush | Pierre, SD 57501 | $235,761 |
29 | Elton Eller Inc | Onida, SD 57564 | $232,791 |
30 | Foth Farms Inc | Onida, SD 57564 | $229,730 |
31 | William G Zimmerman | Pierre, SD 57501 | $218,652 |
32 | Warriner Paul/bonni | Blunt, SD 57522 | $211,726 |
33 | Mark E Barber | Onida, SD 57564 | $209,064 |
34 | Wayne Heien | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $205,188 |
35 | Ted Asmussen Partnership | Agar, SD 57520 | $204,906 |
36 | Maynard-maynard Klin A Klingbeil | Onida, SD 57564 | $197,961 |
37 | Providence Inc | Onida, SD 57564 | $192,924 |
38 | Douglas G Marsh | Onida, SD 57564 | $191,592 |
39 | Hyde Bros | Onida, SD 57564 | $191,370 |
40 | The Robert H & Marcia N Lamb Fami | Salt Lake City, UT 84117 | $191,225 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”