Total Conservation Programs in Sully County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 181
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Sully County, South Dakota totaled $2,188,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jackie Yackley | Onida, SD 57564 | $19,976 |
42 | Kirk F Yackley | Onida, SD 57564 | $19,974 |
43 | , | $19,900 | |
44 | Howard D Clark & Sons Family Limited Partnership | Onida, SD 57564 | $19,692 |
45 | Kay Thomas | Harrold, SD 57536 | $19,583 |
46 | Glenda Minder Family Limited Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $19,431 |
47 | Hartman And Pahl | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $19,345 |
48 | Farries Family Lllp | Onida, SD 57564 | $19,081 |
49 | Richard Mcgee | Onida, SD 57564 | $19,062 |
50 | Jeffrey Bush | Pierre, SD 57501 | $18,453 |
51 | Michele Bush | Pierre, SD 57501 | $18,453 |
52 | The Kirby Warner Family Trust | Riverton, UT 84096 | $18,173 |
53 | Randall R Brown | Pierre, SD 57501 | $17,996 |
54 | Weinheimer Farms Inc | Onida, SD 57564 | $17,804 |
55 | Dennis Weischedel | Onida, SD 57564 | $16,238 |
56 | Winkler Farms Partnership | Onida, SD 57564 | $16,040 |
57 | Wayne A Farries | Onida, SD 57564 | $15,930 |
58 | Lori Wilbur | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $15,349 |
59 | Tf Farms Inc | Onida, SD 57564 | $15,200 |
60 | H Bar Lazy H LLC | Blythewood, SC 29016 | $14,857 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”