Conservation Reserve Program in Tripp County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 347
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Tripp County, South Dakota totaled $1,425,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Bradleyon Butte LLC | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $4,240 |
82 | Manbull Farming LLC | Colome, SD 57528 | $4,184 |
83 | Daniel L Musilek | Wewela, SD 57580 | $4,149 |
84 | Kenneth D Kauer | Winner, SD 57580 | $4,138 |
85 | Jeremy Dean Clay | Winner, SD 57580 | $4,078 |
86 | Thunder Creek Partners | Dallas, SD 57529 | $4,076 |
87 | James Massa | Winner, SD 57580 | $4,064 |
88 | Patrick E Taggart | Dallas, SD 57529 | $4,031 |
89 | James M Hyland | Tea, SD 57064 | $3,998 |
90 | Leonard J Fleischer Living Trust | Tulsa, OK 74137 | $3,946 |
91 | Tuque Prairie Farms Inc | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $3,802 |
92 | Troy Marion Best | Winner, SD 57580 | $3,794 |
93 | Dawn Nagel Guptill Hartl | Pierre, SD 57501 | $3,710 |
94 | Kim Nagel | Winner, SD 57580 | $3,710 |
95 | Duane Lee Bertram | Dallas, SD 57529 | $3,710 |
96 | Kjk LLC | Eldorado, IL 62930 | $3,653 |
97 | Matthew Neil Lantz | Ideal, SD 57541 | $3,643 |
98 | , | $3,643 | |
99 | Matthew Lowe | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $3,607 |
100 | Hammerbeck Land & Cattle Co | Hamill, SD 57534 | $3,604 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”