Market Loss Assistance Program in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,078
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $13,480,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Curry William & David | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $155,268 |
2 | Cloverleaf Farms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $139,888 |
3 | Livestock Placement Services Llp | Columbia, MD 21045 | $120,000 |
4 | Larry Donald Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $116,303 |
5 | Michael Joseph Rozell | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $115,088 |
6 | Dennis John Chicoine | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $106,521 |
7 | Loren Brent Nilson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $104,311 |
8 | Vansloten & Nilson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $101,500 |
9 | Keiser Dairy Farm Inc | Alcester, SD 57001 | $99,999 |
10 | Larry Lee Nilson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $98,515 |
11 | Davis & Davis | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $96,974 |
12 | Trudeau Farms Inc | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $96,808 |
13 | Leafstedt Farm | Alcester, SD 57001 | $94,740 |
14 | Allen James Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $93,767 |
15 | Heeren Circle H Fms Inc | Akron, IA 51001 | $93,601 |
16 | Heeren Farms Partnership | Akron, IA 51001 | $89,800 |
17 | Thomas William Curry | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $88,824 |
18 | Robert Jager | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $85,639 |
19 | Appley Farms Inc | Akron, IA 51001 | $82,428 |
20 | Dwight Merl Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $81,858 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>