Direct Payment Program in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,265
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $43,598,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cloverleaf Farms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $280,031 |
22 | Larry Dean Young | Alcester, SD 57001 | $276,511 |
23 | Michael Joseph Rozell | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $273,764 |
24 | Melvin Thomas Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $273,018 |
25 | George Charles Donnelly Sr | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $272,905 |
26 | Larry Lee Nilson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $268,500 |
27 | Heckathorn Fms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $260,204 |
28 | Heeren Circle H Fms Inc | Akron, IA 51001 | $259,745 |
29 | Frank Raymond Minor | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $258,544 |
30 | Dene Arthur Doty | Alcester, SD 57001 | $258,441 |
31 | Davis & Davis | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $251,974 |
32 | Daniel Joseph Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $233,991 |
33 | Stephen Bernard Allard | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $233,431 |
34 | Richard Howard Fennel | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $232,478 |
35 | Elizabeth Johanna Lykken | Alcester, SD 57001 | $224,498 |
36 | Michael Joseph Allard | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $223,541 |
37 | Eldean Oneal Lykken | Alcester, SD 57001 | $222,534 |
38 | Craig Wilken | Akron, IA 51001 | $220,666 |
39 | Rodney Russell Ballinger | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $218,069 |
40 | Vaughn Arden Johnson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $217,624 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”