Total Emergency Relief Program in Union County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 135
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $1,833,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thomas R Sullivan | Burbank, SD 57010 | $23,205 |
22 | Larry Lee Nilson Revocable Trust | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $22,901 |
23 | Patricia A Hoffman | North Sioux City, SD 57049 | $22,825 |
24 | Philip Oliver Lerseth | Beresford, SD 57004 | $22,649 |
25 | Allen James Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $21,066 |
26 | D & M Hamilton Farms LLC | Hudson, SD 57034 | $20,102 |
27 | , | $18,936 | |
28 | Luke John Boyer | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $17,254 |
29 | Brennen Reid Bird | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $14,401 |
30 | Ricky Allen Hughes | Akron, IA 51001 | $13,840 |
31 | Roger Sayler Jr | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $13,814 |
32 | Kelly Joseph O'connor | Meckling, SD 57069 | $13,484 |
33 | Edward Oliver Williams | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $13,132 |
34 | Darin Neil Johnson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $13,042 |
35 | James William Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $12,918 |
36 | Anthony James Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $12,918 |
37 | Robert Peter Walsh | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $12,914 |
38 | Regan Homandberg | Alcester, SD 57001 | $12,331 |
39 | Dene Arthur Doty | Alcester, SD 57001 | $11,792 |
40 | Randall Jay Terpstra | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $11,597 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”