Total Emergency Relief Program in Union County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 241
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $2,798,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jason Howard Twedt | Beresford, SD 57004 | $26,438 |
22 | Timothy Alan Wilken | Akron, IA 51001 | $26,211 |
23 | Dene Arthur Doty | Alcester, SD 57001 | $24,752 |
24 | Van Ballegooyen Brothers Inc | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $24,688 |
25 | John Edward Larsen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $22,411 |
26 | Thomas R Sullivan | Burbank, SD 57010 | $22,289 |
27 | Vaughn Arden Johnson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $21,196 |
28 | Randy James Erickson | Akron, IA 51001 | $20,142 |
29 | , | $20,068 | |
30 | Larry Lee Nilson Revocable Trust | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $19,869 |
31 | James Melvin Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $19,570 |
32 | Kelly Joseph O'connor | Meckling, SD 57069 | $18,842 |
33 | Nicholas Dwight Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $18,765 |
34 | Randall Scott Ronning | Alcester, SD 57001 | $18,559 |
35 | Tornberg Farms Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $18,541 |
36 | Bruce Evan Klemme | Akron, IA 51001 | $17,582 |
37 | Shaun Michael Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $17,420 |
38 | Ryan Todd Ronning | Alcester, SD 57001 | $16,118 |
39 | Benjamin Lloyd Johnson | Hudson, SD 57034 | $15,857 |
40 | Adam Arthur Scott | Alcester, SD 57001 | $15,770 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”